Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Antonia Schmidt vs Berfu Cengiz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schmidt vs Cengiz analysis and find out who is favored!
Antonia Schmidt vs Berfu Cengiz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schmidt 0 - 0 Cengiz
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmidt has won 47.5% of points on his second serve, while Cengiz has won 46.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmidt, in recent form, has won 56.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cengiz has won 61.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.43% and 37.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmidt has saved 56.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cengiz has saved 54.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmidt has won 60.32% of matches played (W/L 38/ 25), with Cengiz winning 49.12% (W/L 28/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmidt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 90/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Cengiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 97/ 56), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 69/ 61).
- Player level: In the last year, Schmidt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.66% of matches (W/L 22/ 19), where as Cengiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.02% of matches (W/L 25/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmidt has played against opponents with an average rank of 260.13 while Cengiz has played against players with an average rank of 326.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmidt has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cengiz has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmidt has converted 48.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cengiz has converted 50.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Antonia Schmidt | Berfu Cengiz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (18/11) | 62% (18/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (38/28) | 59% (41/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (321/297) | 53% (345/308) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 71% (15/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 94 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 101 | 78 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:16 | 1:36:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.41 | 332.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1272/1979) | 67% (1373/2044) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (832/1272) | 60% (830/1373) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (327/707) | 46% (312/671) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (110/225) | 51% (131/257) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (868/1983) | 46% (1002/2155) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (11/8) | 60% (15/10) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (18/29) | 62% (18/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 76% (17/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 24% (17/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 42% (12/5) |
Antonia Schmidt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Elysia Bolton
Player
Antonia Schmidt
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
1
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
Player
Antonia Schmidt
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Destanee Aiava
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Isabel Skoog
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Antonia Schmidt
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Antonia Schmidt
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Nina Vargova
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Julia Middendorf
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
16 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Antonia Schmidt
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Emeline Dartron
48%
(
38 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Berfu Cengiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Jana Kolodynska
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Berfu Cengiz
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Francesca Curmi
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Fanny Stollar
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
114)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Gergana Topalova
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Sandra Samir
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Berfu Cengiz
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Schmidt Vs Cengiz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Berfu Cengiz
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
